نبرد شناختی و مدیریت ادراک در در منازعات معاصر؛تحلیل خطاهای شناختی تصمیم‌گیران جنگ ۱۲ روزه

1. منابع

فارسی:

1. یانگ، مایکل و شیفر، مارک. (۱۳۹۸). راه‌های ارزیابی ادراک در روابط بین‌الملل. تهران: نشر نی.
2. واکر، مایکل جی. (۱۳۹۵). فرآیند ادراکی و تصمیم‌گیری سیاست خارجی. فصلنامه مطالعات سیاسی، 2(۱)، ۵۵–۸۲.
3. هرمان، مارگارت جی. (۱۳۹۶). تبیین رفتار سیاست خارجی بر پایه‌ی خصوصیات فردی تصمیم‌گیرندگان سیاسی. مجله سیاست و جامعه، ۷ (۲)، ۲۱–۴۵.
4. هرمان، ریچارد کی. و فیشر کلر، مایکل پی. (۱۳۹۷). فراتر از تصویر دشمن و مدل مارپیچی: پژوهش ادراکی-راهبردی پس از جنگ سرد. مجله روابط بین‌الملل، ۳ (۱)، ۹–۴۰.
5. ژرژ، جورج. (۱۳۹۷). برداشت‌ها و سوء برداشت‌ها در سیاست بین‌الملل. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
6. سیدجعفری، سید امیر و احمدی، خدابخش. (1404). مرور واقع گرایانه سوگیری‌ های شناختی در تصمیمات حکمرانی. فصلنامه علمی حکمرانی متعالی، 5 (4)، 89-113.
7. مسعودی، حیدرعلی و سلیمانی، محسن . (1403). نقش سوگیری‌های شناختی در فهم سیاست خارجی و جهانی: بررسی رویکردهای محمود احمدی‌نژاد و حسن روحانی. سیاست جهانی. (3) 13.38-7.
8. مهدی، رضا. (1404). تحلیل تأثیرات سوگیری‌های شناختی بر تصمیمات و انتخا‌ب‌های سیاسی. شناخت پژوهی مطالعات سیاسی، 2(2)، 26-47.
9. خدادادی، ف. (۱۳۹۹). جنگ‌های هیبریدی و نقش نبرد شناختی در آن‌ها. نشریه علوم امنیتی.
10. هرمان، م. جی.، فیشر، م. پی. (۲۰۰۲). فراسوی تصویر دشمن و مدل مارپیچی: پژوهش ادراکی-راهبردی پس از جنگ سرد. نشریه سیاست‌گذاری بین‌الملل.
11. کاپلان، ب.، هارول، ج. (۲۰۰۵). تصمیم‌گیری در بحران: تحلیل‌های شناختی و روانشناسی در سیاست خارجی. درباره سیاست‌های بین‌المللی.

منابع انگلیسی:

1.Foster, D. M., & Clare, J. W. (1997). Complexity in decision-making: Misperception, mistrust, and the deviant use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6), 823–854.

2.Herman, M. G. (1990). Explaining foreign policy behavior: Individual characteristics of political decision makers. Political Psychology, 11(1), 1–28.

3.Herman, R. K., & Fisher, M. P. (1992). Beyond the enemy image: A spiral model of perceptual-strategic research after the Cold War. International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 301–320

4.Jervis, R. (2017). Perception and misperception in international politics (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

5.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(October), 251–278.

6.Walker, M. J. (1990). The perceptual process and foreign policy decision-making. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 345–370.

7.Young, M., & Schiffer, M. (1990). Assessing perceptions in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 34(4), 401–425.

8.Herzog, A. (2019). Cognitive Errors in Strategic Decision Making: A Case Study of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Journal of Strategic Studies, 42(4), 463-488.

9.Young, M. & Schaffer, M. (2007). Assessing Cognitive Biases in Foreign Policy Decision-Making. Journal of Political Psychology.

10.Herman, M. & Fisher, R. (2000). Strategic Deception and Cognitive Biases: An Analysis of International Relations. Foreign Policy Analysis.

11.Foster, D. & Clare, J. (2010). Cognitive Errors in Crisis Management: A Study of International Security. Security Studies.

12.Tetlock, P. (2003). Social-Psychological Approaches to Political Decision Making. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.Walker, M. (2002). Cognitive Biases in Conflict and War: The Middle East in Focus. Conflict Studies.

14.Wiley Online Library 7. Yoon, M. (2000). Cognitive Biases in Threat Perception and Foreign Policy Decision-Making. International Relations Review.

15.Jervis, R. (2005). The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton University Press.

16.Morris, P. (2006). Rational Choice and Strategic Decision-Making: Cognitive Biases in International Politics. Political Psychology.

17.Thomas, E. (2004). Strategic Deception and Cognitive Biases in War. Foreign Affairs.

18.Jervis, R. (1992). The Logic of Threat Perception in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly.

19.McDermott, R. (2002). The Political Psychology of Fear: How Cognitive Biases Affect Foreign Policy. Political Psychology Review.

20.Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neorealism and the Politics of Foreign Policy. Princeton University Press.

21.Levy, J. S. (1997). Domestic Politics and the Diversionary Use of Force. International Studies Quarterly.

22.Morrow, J. D. (1994). The Strategic Use of Cognitive Bias in Political Decision-Making. International Security.

23.Smith, M. (1995). The Influence of Cognitive Biases on Foreign Policy Decision-Making. International Politics Review.

24.Houghton, D. (2004). International Relations and Cognitive Psychology. Global Politics.

25.Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decision. Journal of Business.

26.Miller, R. A. (2005). The Influence of Cognitive Biases in International Relations. Political Science Review.

27.Fiske, S. T. (2008). Social Cognition and Decision-Making in International Relations. Political Psychology Journal.

28.Paul, C., Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model: Why it Might Work and Options to Counter It. RAND Corporation.

29Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.

30.Hermann, M. G. (1999). The Role of Cognitive and Motivational Factors in Political Decision Making. In Political Psychology: Critical Perspectives.

31.Foster, D. M., & Kler, J. W. (2002). Cognitive complexity and decision-making: The psychology of trust and conflict in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 46(3), 423-438.

32.Herman, M. J. (1993). Explaining foreign policy behavior: Individual-level and group-level approaches. International Politics, 30(2), 103-120.

33.Herman, R. K., & Fisher, M. P. (2003). Beyond the enemy image and the spiral model: Cognitive-behavioral approaches to post-cold war strategic decision-making. Journal of Political Psychology, 28(4), 347-360.

34.Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453.

35. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
36. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
37. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
38. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.
39. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.
40. Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. Yale University Press.
41. Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment. Princeton University Press.
42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

43.Wohlstetter, R. (1962). Pearl Harbor: Warning and decision. Stanford University Press.

44.Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. Putnam. Herrmann, R. K. (1985). Perceptions and behavior in Soviet foreign policy. University of Pittsburgh Press.

45.Herrmann, R. K., & Fischerkeller, M. (1995). Beyond the enemy image spiral model. International Organization, 49(3), 415–450.

46. Holsti, O. R. (1976). Foreign policy formation viewed cognitively. Princeton University Press.

47.Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.

48.Khong, Y. F. (1992). Analogies at war. Princeton University Press.

49.Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence. University of Chicago Press.

50.Osgood, C. E., Saporta, S., & Nunnally, J. C. (1956). Evaluative assertion analysis. Litera, 3, 47–102.

51.Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. MIT Press.

52.Foster, D. M., & Keller, J. W. (2014). Leaders’ cognitive complexity, distrust, and the diversionary use of force. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(2), 205–223.

53.Herrmann, R. K. (1985). Perceptions and behavior in Soviet foreign policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

54.Herrmann, R. K., & Fischerkeller, M. P. (1995). Beyond the enemy image and spiral model. International Organization, 49(3), 415–450.

55.Hermann, M. G. (1980). Explaining foreign policy behavior using the personal characteristics of political leaders. International Studies Quarterly, 24(1), 7–46.

56. Hermann, M. G. (1984). Personality and foreign policy decision making. New York: Praeger.
57. Jervis, R. (2017). How states think: The psychology of international politics. Princeton University Press.

58.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278.

59. Walker, S. G. (1983). The perceptual process in foreign policy decision making. Political Psychology, 4(1), 3–22.
60. Young, M. D., & Schafer, M. (1998). Is there method in our madness? Mershon International Studies Review, 42(1), 63–96.

61.Jervis, R. (2006). Why Intelligence Fails: Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press